Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO CVES0.9 vs Leyard VDS009

On measurable specs the Leyard VDS009 leads 7–3. The AOTO CVES0.9 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch0.9375 mm0.9375 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)600 × 338 × 38 mm600 × 338 × 44 mm
Weight per cabinet5 kg5.1 kg
Weight per m²24.7 kg/m²25 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution640 × 360 px640 × 360 px
Pixel density1,137,778 px/m²1,137,778 px/m²
Brightness550 nits600 nits
Refresh rate4,000 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast6,000:120,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)170° / 170°170° / 170°
LED typeIMDCOB
Processing depth—16 bit
Power & thermal
Average power60 W35 W
Max power130 W76 W
Max power per m²642 W/m²375 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet444 BTU/h259 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)IP30IP54
IP rating (rear)IP30—
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C-10 to 40 °C
Service accessFrontFront
LED lifetime100,000 h100,000 h
Certifications——

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.