Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO C1.8 vs ROE Visual MR-C1.9

On measurable specs the AOTO C1.8 leads 8–4. The ROE Visual MR-C1.9 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch1.875 mm1.9 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)480 × 480 × 82 mm500 × 500 × 65 mm
Weight per cabinet3.9 kg6 kg
Weight per m²16.8 kg/m²24 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution256 × 256 px256 × 256 px
Pixel density284,444 px/m²262,144 px/m²
Brightness1,000 nits1,000 nits
Refresh rate3,000 Hz7,680 Hz
Contrast3,000:1—
Viewing angle (H/V)160° / 160°160° / 160°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth—15 bit
Power & thermal
Average power45 W75 W
Max power110 W150 W
Max power per m²477 W/m²600 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet375 BTU/h512 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)IP30IP40
IP rating (rear)IP30IP40
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C-20 to 45 °C
Service accessFront & rearFront
LED lifetime——
Certifications—CE, FCC, ETL, UKCA, RoHS, WEEE

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.