Skip to content
wikiLED

ROE Visual CB3 Half vs Sharp LD-FA382

On measurable specs the ROE Visual CB3 Half leads 8–5. The Sharp LD-FA382 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch3.75 mm3.8 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)600 × 600 × 77 mm608 × 342 × 49 mm
Weight per cabinet7.5 kg8.8 kg
Weight per m²20.8 kg/m²42.3 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution160 × 160 px160 × 90 px
Pixel density71,111 px/m²69,252 px/m²
Brightness1,500 nits1,200 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast—7,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)140° / 140°160° / 140°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth14 bit16 bit
Power & thermal
Average power130 W47 W
Max power260 W120 W
Max power per m²722 W/m²577 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet887 BTU/h409 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)IP40IP20
IP rating (rear)IP40IP20
Operating temperature-20 to 45 °C-20 to 40 °C
Service accessRearFront
LED lifetime—100,000 h
CertificationsCE, ETL, FCCCCC, CE, ETL, FCC Class A, RoHS

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.