AOTO U2.8 vs Leyard CDI Pro 2.9
On measurable specs the Leyard CDI Pro 2.9 leads 7–4. The AOTO U2.8 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.
| Add a panel | ||
|---|---|---|
| Physical | ||
| Pixel pitch | 2.85714 mm | 2.97619 mm |
| Cabinet size (W×H×D) | 480 × 640 × 63 mm | 500 × 500 × 40 mm |
| Weight per cabinet | 7.1 kg | 5.3 kg |
| Weight per m² | 23.1 kg/m² | 21 kg/m² |
| Image | ||
| Cabinet resolution | 168 × 224 px | 168 × 168 px |
| Pixel density | 122,500 px/m² | 112,896 px/m² |
| Brightness | 1,000 nits | 800 nits |
| Refresh rate | 7,680 Hz | 7,680 Hz |
| Contrast | 5,000:1 | 4,000:1 |
| Viewing angle (H/V) | 160° / 160° | 160° / 140° |
| LED type | SMD | SMD |
| Processing depth | — | 14 bit |
| Power & thermal | ||
| Average power | 50 W | 33 W |
| Max power | 150 W | 98 W |
| Max power per m² | 488 W/m² | 390 W/m² |
| Thermal load per cabinet | 512 BTU/h | 333 BTU/h |
| Operational | ||
| Environment | Indoor | Indoor |
| IP rating (front) | — | IP30 |
| IP rating (rear) | — | IP30 |
| Operating temperature | -10 to 40 °C | -20 to 40 °C |
| Service access | Front | Front & rear |
| LED lifetime | 100,000 h | 100,000 h |
| Certifications | — | — |
Size a wall with either panel
The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.