Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO RM2.3B vs ROE Visual TP2.2

On measurable specs the ROE Visual TP2.2 leads 5–4. The AOTO RM2.3B can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch2.31481 mm2.23214 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)500 × 500 × 68 mm500 × 500 × 73 mm
Weight per cabinet9.3 kg8 kg
Weight per m²37.2 kg/m²32 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution216 × 216 px224 × 224 px
Pixel density186,624 px/m²200,704 px/m²
Brightness1,500 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz7,680 Hz
Contrast10,000:1—
Viewing angle (H/V)170° / 170°140° / 140°
LED typeIMDSMD
Processing depth—15 bit
Power & thermal
Average power50 W80 W
Max power155 W160 W
Max power per m²620 W/m²640 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet529 BTU/h546 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)—IP40
IP rating (rear)—IP40
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C-20 to 45 °C
Service accessFront & rearFront & rear
LED lifetime100,000 h—
Certifications—CE, CB, ETL, FCC, UKCA, WEEE

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.