AOTO RM2.3 vs ROE Visual TP-C2.2
On measurable specs the ROE Visual TP-C2.2 leads 6–3. The AOTO RM2.3 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.
| Add a panel | ||
|---|---|---|
| Physical | ||
| Pixel pitch | 2.31481 mm | 2.23214 mm |
| Cabinet size (W×H×D) | 500 × 500 × 68 mm | 500 × 500 × 108 mm |
| Weight per cabinet | 8.2 kg | 8.4 kg |
| Weight per m² | 32.8 kg/m² | 33.6 kg/m² |
| Image | ||
| Cabinet resolution | 216 × 216 px | 224 × 224 px |
| Pixel density | 186,624 px/m² | 200,704 px/m² |
| Brightness | 1,500 nits | 1,500 nits |
| Refresh rate | 7,680 Hz | 7,680 Hz |
| Contrast | 15,000:1 | — |
| Viewing angle (H/V) | 170° / 170° | 140° / 140° |
| LED type | IMD | SMD |
| Processing depth | — | 15 bit |
| Power & thermal | ||
| Average power | 52 W | 80 W |
| Max power | 167 W | 160 W |
| Max power per m² | 668 W/m² | 640 W/m² |
| Thermal load per cabinet | 570 BTU/h | 546 BTU/h |
| Operational | ||
| Environment | Indoor | Indoor |
| IP rating (front) | — | IP40 |
| IP rating (rear) | — | IP40 |
| Operating temperature | -10 to 40 °C | -20 to 45 °C |
| Service access | Front & rear | Rear |
| LED lifetime | — | — |
| Certifications | — | CE, CB, ETL, FCC, UKCA, WEEE |
Size a wall with either panel
The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.