Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO E8 vs Samsung XPR080-S

On measurable specs the AOTO E8 leads 9–3. The Samsung XPR080-S can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch8 mm8.333 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)960 × 720 × 77 mm1,000 × 1,000 × 264 mm
Weight per cabinet19 kg41 kg
Weight per m²27.5 kg/m²41 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution120 × 90 px120 × 120 px
Pixel density15,625 px/m²14,400 px/m²
Brightness8,000 nits8,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz7,680 Hz
Contrast5,000:18,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)160° / 110°160° / 90°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth20 bit16 bit
Power & thermal
Average power167 W270 W
Max power500 W1,000 W
Max power per m²723 W/m²1,000 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet1,706 BTU/h3,412 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentOutdoorOutdoor
IP rating (front)IP66IP66
IP rating (rear)IP66IP66
Operating temperature-20 to 50 °C-40 to 55 °C
Service accessFront & rear—
LED lifetime—100,000 h
Certifications—CE, UL, ULC

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.