AOTO C1.8 vs ROE Visual MR1.9 Half
On measurable specs the AOTO C1.8 leads 8–4. The ROE Visual MR1.9 Half can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.
| Add a panel | ||
|---|---|---|
| Physical | ||
| Pixel pitch | 1.875 mm | 1.9 mm |
| Cabinet size (W×H×D) | 480 × 480 × 82 mm | 500 × 500 × 48 mm |
| Weight per cabinet | 3.9 kg | 7.4 kg |
| Weight per m² | 16.8 kg/m² | 29.6 kg/m² |
| Image | ||
| Cabinet resolution | 256 × 256 px | 256 × 256 px |
| Pixel density | 284,444 px/m² | 262,144 px/m² |
| Brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 3,000 Hz | 7,680 Hz |
| Contrast | 3,000:1 | — |
| Viewing angle (H/V) | 160° / 160° | 160° / 160° |
| LED type | SMD | SMD |
| Processing depth | — | 15 bit |
| Power & thermal | ||
| Average power | 45 W | 75 W |
| Max power | 110 W | 150 W |
| Max power per m² | 477 W/m² | 600 W/m² |
| Thermal load per cabinet | 375 BTU/h | 512 BTU/h |
| Operational | ||
| Environment | Indoor | Indoor |
| IP rating (front) | IP30 | IP40 |
| IP rating (rear) | IP30 | IP40 |
| Operating temperature | -10 to 40 °C | -20 to 45 °C |
| Service access | Front & rear | Front |
| LED lifetime | — | — |
| Certifications | — | CE, FCC, ETL, UKCA, RoHS, WEEE |
Size a wall with either panel
The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.