Skip to content
wikiLED

ROE Visual JT3.1 vs Sharp LD-FA312

On measurable specs the ROE Visual JT3.1 leads 9–4. The Sharp LD-FA312 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch3.125 mm3.1667 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)500 × 1,000 × 86 mm608 × 342 × 49 mm
Weight per cabinet10.3 kg8.8 kg
Weight per m²20.6 kg/m²42.3 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution160 × 320 px192 × 108 px
Pixel density102,400 px/m²99,723 px/m²
Brightness1,300 nits1,200 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast—7,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)160° / 140°160° / 140°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth16 bit16 bit
Power & thermal
Average power140 W47 W
Max power280 W120 W
Max power per m²560 W/m²577 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet955 BTU/h409 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)IP40IP20
IP rating (rear)IP40IP20
Operating temperature-20 to 45 °C-20 to 40 °C
Service accessFront & rearFront
LED lifetime—100,000 h
CertificationsCE, ETL, FCC, UKCA, RoHS, WEEECCC, CE, ETL, FCC Class A, RoHS

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.