Skip to content
wikiLED

ROE Visual BQ3.9 vs Samsung XRB039-Y

On measurable specs the Samsung XRB039-Y leads 5–3. The ROE Visual BQ3.9 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch3.90625 mm3.9 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)500 × 1,000 × 83 mm500 × 1,000 × 65 mm
Weight per cabinet22 kg14 kg
Weight per m²44 kg/m²28 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution128 × 256 px128 × 256 px
Pixel density65,536 px/m²65,536 px/m²
Brightness5,000 nits5,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast—4,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)160° / 110°160° / 160°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth15 bit—
Power & thermal
Average power180 W130 W
Max power360 W380 W
Max power per m²720 W/m²760 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet1,228 BTU/h1,297 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentOutdoorOutdoor
IP rating (front)IP65IP65
IP rating (rear)IP65IP65
Operating temperature-20 to 45 °C-30 to 50 °C
Service accessFront & rear—
LED lifetime—100,000 h
CertificationsCE, ETL, FCC, WEEEIEC 60950-1, IEC 62368, EMC Class A

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.