Skip to content
wikiLED

Planar Komodo 0.9 vs Samsung MP008F

On measurable specs the Planar Komodo 0.9 leads 6–4. The Samsung MP008F can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch0.9375 mm0.84 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)600 × 338 × 70 mm806 × 454 × 49 mm
Weight per cabinet4.8 kg9.2 kg
Weight per m²23.7 kg/m²25.2 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution640 × 360 px960 × 540 px
Pixel density1,137,778 px/m²1,417,234 px/m²
Brightness1,000 nits1,000 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast—29,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)170° / 150°170° / 155°
LED typeCOBCOB
Processing depth—16 bit
Power & thermal
Average power28 W64 W
Max power85 W122 W
Max power per m²420 W/m²334 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet290 BTU/h416 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)—IP40
IP rating (rear)—IP20
Operating temperature0 to 40 °C0 to 40 °C
Service accessFrontFront
LED lifetime100,000 h150,000 h
Certifications—IEC 62368-1, IEC 60950-1, EMC Class B, TUV Eye Comfort, Pantone Validated

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.