Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO U2.3 vs INFiLED IRWP2.3 Wrap Lite

On measurable specs the INFiLED IRWP2.3 Wrap Lite leads 7–3. The AOTO U2.3 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch2.35294 mm2.34 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)480 × 640 × 63 mm300 × 338 × 30 mm
Weight per cabinet7.1 kg3.1 kg
Weight per m²23.1 kg/m²30.6 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution204 × 272 px128 × 144 px
Pixel density180,625 px/m²182,044 px/m²
Brightness1,000 nits1,000 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast5,000:15,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)160° / 160°160° / 160°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth—14 bit
Power & thermal
Average power50 W18 W
Max power150 W53 W
Max power per m²488 W/m²523 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet512 BTU/h181 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)—IP30
IP rating (rear)—IP30
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C-10 to 45 °C
Service accessFrontFront
LED lifetime100,000 h100,000 h
Certifications—CE, FCC, ETL, CB, RoHS, REACH, WEEE

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.