Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO SV3.9 vs Samsung XRB039-S

On measurable specs the Samsung XRB039-S leads 5–3. The AOTO SV3.9 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch3.90625 mm3.9 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)500 × 1,000 × 103 mm500 × 1,000 × 65 mm
Weight per cabinet15 kg14.2 kg
Weight per m²30 kg/m²28.4 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution128 × 256 px128 × 256 px
Pixel density65,536 px/m²65,536 px/m²
Brightness5,000 nits5,000 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast8,000:14,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)160° / 160°160° / 160°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth20 bit—
Power & thermal
Average power120 W130 W
Max power380 W380 W
Max power per m²760 W/m²760 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet1,297 BTU/h1,297 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentOutdoorOutdoor
IP rating (front)IP65IP65
IP rating (rear)IP54IP65
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C-30 to 50 °C
Service accessFront & rear—
LED lifetime—100,000 h
Certifications—IEC 60950-1, IEC 62368, EMC Class A

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.