AOTO SV3.9 vs ROE Visual BQ3.9
It's a draw on the measurable specs (5–5 of 10): the AOTO SV3.9 and ROE Visual BQ3.9 trade wins evenly, so let power budget, weight limits and price decide.
| Add a panel | ||
|---|---|---|
| Physical | ||
| Pixel pitch | 3.90625 mm | 3.90625 mm |
| Cabinet size (W×H×D) | 500 × 1,000 × 103 mm | 500 × 1,000 × 83 mm |
| Weight per cabinet | 15 kg | 22 kg |
| Weight per m² | 30 kg/m² | 44 kg/m² |
| Image | ||
| Cabinet resolution | 128 × 256 px | 128 × 256 px |
| Pixel density | 65,536 px/m² | 65,536 px/m² |
| Brightness | 5,000 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 7,680 Hz | 3,840 Hz |
| Contrast | 8,000:1 | — |
| Viewing angle (H/V) | 160° / 160° | 160° / 110° |
| LED type | SMD | SMD |
| Processing depth | 20 bit | 15 bit |
| Power & thermal | ||
| Average power | 120 W | 180 W |
| Max power | 380 W | 360 W |
| Max power per m² | 760 W/m² | 720 W/m² |
| Thermal load per cabinet | 1,297 BTU/h | 1,228 BTU/h |
| Operational | ||
| Environment | Outdoor | Outdoor |
| IP rating (front) | IP65 | IP65 |
| IP rating (rear) | IP54 | IP65 |
| Operating temperature | -10 to 40 °C | -20 to 45 °C |
| Service access | Front & rear | Front & rear |
| LED lifetime | — | — |
| Certifications | — | CE, ETL, FCC, WEEE |
Size a wall with either panel
The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.