AOTO RM1.9 vs ROE Visual TP-C1.9
On measurable specs the ROE Visual TP-C1.9 leads 4–3. The AOTO RM1.9 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.
| Add a panel | ||
|---|---|---|
| Physical | ||
| Pixel pitch | 1.95312 mm | 1.95312 mm |
| Cabinet size (W×H×D) | 500 × 500 × 68 mm | 500 × 500 × 108 mm |
| Weight per cabinet | 8.2 kg | 8.5 kg |
| Weight per m² | 32.8 kg/m² | 34 kg/m² |
| Image | ||
| Cabinet resolution | 256 × 256 px | 256 × 256 px |
| Pixel density | 262,144 px/m² | 262,144 px/m² |
| Brightness | 1,500 nits | 1,500 nits |
| Refresh rate | 7,680 Hz | 7,680 Hz |
| Contrast | 15,000:1 | — |
| Viewing angle (H/V) | 170° / 170° | 140° / 140° |
| LED type | IMD | IMD |
| Processing depth | — | 15 bit |
| Power & thermal | ||
| Average power | 55 W | 70 W |
| Max power | 150 W | 140 W |
| Max power per m² | 600 W/m² | 560 W/m² |
| Thermal load per cabinet | 512 BTU/h | 478 BTU/h |
| Operational | ||
| Environment | Indoor | Indoor |
| IP rating (front) | — | IP40 |
| IP rating (rear) | — | IP40 |
| Operating temperature | -10 to 40 °C | -20 to 45 °C |
| Service access | Front & rear | Rear |
| LED lifetime | — | — |
| Certifications | — | CE, CB, ETL, FCC, UKCA, WEEE |
Size a wall with either panel
The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.