Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO RM1.9 vs ROE Visual RB1.9F

On measurable specs the ROE Visual RB1.9F leads 4–3. The AOTO RM1.9 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch1.95312 mm1.95312 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)500 × 500 × 68 mm500 × 500 × 73 mm
Weight per cabinet8.2 kg8.3 kg
Weight per m²32.8 kg/m²33.2 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution256 × 256 px256 × 256 px
Pixel density262,144 px/m²262,144 px/m²
Brightness1,500 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz7,680 Hz
Contrast15,000:1—
Viewing angle (H/V)170° / 170°140° / 140°
LED typeIMDIMD
Processing depth—16 bit
Power & thermal
Average power55 W70 W
Max power150 W140 W
Max power per m²600 W/m²560 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet512 BTU/h478 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)—IP40
IP rating (rear)—IP40
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C-20 to 45 °C
Service accessFront & rearFront & rear
LED lifetime——
Certifications—CE, CB, ETL, FCC, UKCA, WEEE

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.