Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO RM1.5 vs ROE Visual TP-C1.5

On measurable specs the ROE Visual TP-C1.5 leads 5–2. The AOTO RM1.5 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch1.5625 mm1.5625 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)500 × 500 × 68 mm500 × 500 × 108 mm
Weight per cabinet8.2 kg8.5 kg
Weight per m²32.8 kg/m²34 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution320 × 320 px320 × 320 px
Pixel density409,600 px/m²409,600 px/m²
Brightness1,500 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz7,680 Hz
Contrast15,000:1—
Viewing angle (H/V)170° / 170°140° / 140°
LED typeIMDIMD
Processing depth—16 bit
Power & thermal
Average power95 W80 W
Max power190 W160 W
Max power per m²760 W/m²640 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet648 BTU/h546 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)—IP40
IP rating (rear)—IP40
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C-20 to 45 °C
Service accessFront & rearRear
LED lifetime——
Certifications—CE, CB, ETL, FCC, UKCA, WEEE

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.