AOTO E4LF vs Leyard LA04S
On measurable specs the Leyard LA04S leads 7–4. The AOTO E4LF can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.
| Add a panel | ||
|---|---|---|
| Physical | ||
| Pixel pitch | 4 mm | 4.44444 mm |
| Cabinet size (W×H×D) | 1,152 × 1,728 × 82 mm | 1,280 × 960 × 71 mm |
| Weight per cabinet | 50 kg | 35 kg |
| Weight per m² | 25.1 kg/m² | 28.5 kg/m² |
| Image | ||
| Cabinet resolution | 288 × 432 px | 288 × 216 px |
| Pixel density | 62,500 px/m² | 50,625 px/m² |
| Brightness | 5,500 nits | 6,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 3,840 Hz | 3,840 Hz |
| Contrast | 5,000:1 | 6,000:1 |
| Viewing angle (H/V) | 140° / 125° | 150° / 110° |
| LED type | SMD | SMD |
| Processing depth | 20 bit | — |
| Power & thermal | ||
| Average power | 360 W | 295 W |
| Max power | 1,200 W | 885 W |
| Max power per m² | 603 W/m² | 720 W/m² |
| Thermal load per cabinet | 4,094 BTU/h | 3,019 BTU/h |
| Operational | ||
| Environment | Outdoor | Outdoor |
| IP rating (front) | IP65 | IP65 |
| IP rating (rear) | IP65 | IP65 |
| Operating temperature | -20 to 50 °C | -30 to 60 °C |
| Service access | Front | Front & rear |
| LED lifetime | — | — |
| Certifications | — | — |
Size a wall with either panel
The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.