Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO CVES0.9 vs Leyard MGP0.9

On measurable specs the Leyard MGP0.9 leads 5–4. The AOTO CVES0.9 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch0.9375 mm0.9375 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)600 × 338 × 38 mm600 × 338 × 53 mm
Weight per cabinet5 kg6.1 kg
Weight per m²24.7 kg/m²30 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution640 × 360 px640 × 360 px
Pixel density1,137,778 px/m²1,137,778 px/m²
Brightness550 nits600 nits
Refresh rate4,000 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast6,000:15,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)170° / 170°160° / 140°
LED typeIMDSMD
Processing depth——
Power & thermal
Average power60 W40 W
Max power130 W120 W
Max power per m²642 W/m²593 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet444 BTU/h409 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)IP30—
IP rating (rear)IP30—
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C-10 to 40 °C
Service accessFrontFront & rear
LED lifetime100,000 h100,000 h
Certifications——

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.