Skip to content
wikiLED

ROE Visual DM3.9 vs Unilumin XF03

On measurable specs the Unilumin XF03 leads 5–4. The ROE Visual DM3.9 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch3.90625 mm3.906 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)500 × 500 × 80 mm500 × 500 × 89 mm
Weight per cabinet5.8 kg13.5 kg
Weight per m²23 kg/m²54 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution128 × 128 px128 × 128 px
Pixel density65,536 px/m²65,536 px/m²
Brightness1,500 nits1,200 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast—10,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)140° / 140°140° / 140°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth14 bit14 bit
Power & thermal
Average power80 W45 W
Max power150 W130 W
Max power per m²600 W/m²520 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet512 BTU/h444 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)IP40IP40
IP rating (rear)IP40IP40
Operating temperature-20 to 45 °C-10 to 45 °C
Service access—Front
LED lifetime—100,000 h
CertificationsCE, ETL, TÜV—

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.