Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO U1.5ES vs Samsung MM015F

On measurable specs the AOTO U1.5ES leads 7–6. The Samsung MM015F can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch1.53846 mm1.56 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)640 × 480 × 63 mm600 × 338 × 50 mm
Weight per cabinet7.1 kg5.1 kg
Weight per m²23.1 kg/m²25.2 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution416 × 312 px384 × 216 px
Pixel density422,500 px/m²409,600 px/m²
Brightness600 nits600 nits
Refresh rate4,200 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast—10,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)160° / 160°160° / 160°
LED type—COB
Processing depth—16 bit
Power & thermal
Average power60 W37 W
Max power140 W95 W
Max power per m²456 W/m²467 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet478 BTU/h323 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentIndoorIndoor
IP rating (front)IP30IP40
IP rating (rear)IP30IP20
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C0 to 40 °C
Service access—Front
LED lifetime50,000 h100,000 h
Certifications—IEC 62368-1, IEC 60950-1, EMC Class A, TUV Eye Comfort

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.