Skip to content
wikiLED

AOTO SV3.9 vs ROE Visual BQ3.9 Half

On measurable specs the ROE Visual BQ3.9 Half leads 6–3. The AOTO SV3.9 can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch3.90625 mm3.90625 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)500 × 1,000 × 103 mm500 × 500 × 83 mm
Weight per cabinet15 kg9.8 kg
Weight per m²30 kg/m²39.2 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution128 × 256 px128 × 128 px
Pixel density65,536 px/m²65,536 px/m²
Brightness5,000 nits5,000 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz3,840 Hz
Contrast8,000:1—
Viewing angle (H/V)160° / 160°160° / 110°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth20 bit15 bit
Power & thermal
Average power120 W85 W
Max power380 W190 W
Max power per m²760 W/m²760 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet1,297 BTU/h648 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentOutdoorOutdoor
IP rating (front)IP65IP65
IP rating (rear)IP54IP65
Operating temperature-10 to 40 °C-20 to 45 °C
Service accessFront & rearFront & rear
LED lifetime——
Certifications—CE, ETL, FCC, WEEE

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.