Skip to content
wikiLED

Absen A0825 vs Samsung XPR080-E

On measurable specs the Absen A0825 leads 11–1. The Samsung XPR080-E can still be the right call where its individual wins — check the highlighted rows — match your constraints.

Add a panel
Physical
Pixel pitch8 mm8.333 mm
Cabinet size (W×H×D)1,280 × 960 × 82 mm1,000 × 1,000 × 264 mm
Weight per cabinet35 kg41 kg
Weight per m²28.5 kg/m²41 kg/m²
Image
Cabinet resolution160 × 120 px120 × 120 px
Pixel density15,625 px/m²14,400 px/m²
Brightness7,500 nits7,000 nits
Refresh rate15,000 Hz7,680 Hz
Contrast10,000:17,000:1
Viewing angle (H/V)160° / 160°160° / 90°
LED typeSMDSMD
Processing depth16 bit16 bit
Power & thermal
Average power110 W270 W
Max power440 W1,000 W
Max power per m²358 W/m²1,000 W/m²
Thermal load per cabinet1,501 BTU/h3,412 BTU/h
Operational
EnvironmentOutdoorOutdoor
IP rating (front)IP66IP66
IP rating (rear)IP66IP66
Operating temperature-30 to 50 °C-40 to 55 °C
Service accessFront & rear—
LED lifetime100,000 h100,000 h
CertificationsCCC, CE, ETL, FCCCE, UL, ULC

Size a wall with either panel

The calculator shows dimensions, power, weight and a validated wiring diagram for both — swap cabinets with one click.